Atopic dermatitis: skin barrier, microbiome and new treatments
Research has deeply renewed our understanding of atopic dermatitis. Skin barrier, microbiome and type-2 inflammation are now the key to targeted treatments — biologics and JAK inhibitors — that transform moderate-to-severe disease.

Doctor Florian A. Vallecillo Cabrera
Author

Atopic dermatitis is now understood through three mechanisms: a fragile skin barrier (filaggrin), a disrupted microbiome (Staphylococcus aureus) and type-2 inflammation (IL-4, IL-13, IL-31). This understanding has enabled targeted treatments — dupilumab, tralokinumab, lebrikizumab, nemolizumab and JAK inhibitors — that transform the outlook for moderate-to-severe disease.
Why is atopic dermatitis at the heart of scientific news?
Atopic dermatitis (or atopic eczema) is the most common chronic inflammatory skin disease: it affects around one in five children and almost one in ten adults in Western countries. Long summarised as "dry, itchy skin", it is now understood as a complex disease at the crossroads of three major mechanisms: an impaired skin barrier, a type-2 immune inflammation and a disrupted skin microbiome.
This new understanding has transformed care. Since 2017, a generation of targeted treatments — biologics and JAK inhibitors — has changed the outlook for moderate-to-severe disease, which for years had no satisfactory solution.
Key takeaway
Atopic dermatitis is no longer seen as a simple dry-skin problem, but as a systemic inflammatory disease whose molecular mechanisms are increasingly well understood — which has made genuinely targeted treatments possible.
The skin barrier: the central role of filaggrin
The outermost layer of the epidermis works like a protective wall. Filaggrin, a key protein, contributes to the cohesion of this wall and to the production of natural moisturising factors. Loss-of-function mutations in the filaggrin gene (described as early as 2006) are one of the main predisposing factors for atopic dermatitis.
When the barrier fails, the skin loses more water (increased transepidermal water loss) and lets allergens, irritants and microbes penetrate more easily. This "outside-in" phenomenon sustains inflammation and scratching. That is why restoring the barrier with emollients remains the foundation of every treatment, even in the era of targeted molecules. For a complete patient-oriented overview, see our guide Everything about atopic dermatitis.
The skin microbiome: dysbiosis and Staphylococcus aureus
The skin hosts a balanced microbial ecosystem. In atopic dermatitis this balance breaks down: microbial diversity decreases and one bacterium, Staphylococcus aureus, takes over, especially during flares.
This staphylococcus produces toxins that worsen inflammation, promote scratching and weaken the barrier further — a genuine vicious circle. Current research is exploring approaches to rebalance the microbiome ("beneficial" bacteria, postbiotics), but these remain experimental. To date, it is mainly the control of inflammation that indirectly restores a healthier microbiome.
Type-2 inflammation: the molecular key
At the core of the disease lies a so-called "type-2" inflammation, driven by specific immune messengers. Three of them play a major role:
- interleukin-4 and interleukin-13 (IL-4 and IL-13): they sustain inflammation and further damage the skin barrier;
- interleukin-31 (IL-31): often nicknamed the "itch cytokine", it is a direct driver of pruritus;
- TSLP and other alarm signals released by damaged skin, which trigger the inflammatory cascade.
Identifying these messengers was decisive: it became possible to block them one by one, rather than dampening the whole immune system.
What the science shows
Understanding type-2 inflammation (IL-4, IL-13, IL-31) made it possible to move from "generalist" treatments to targeted therapies that are more effective and often better tolerated.
Biologics: dupilumab, tralokinumab, lebrikizumab, nemolizumab
Biologics are antibodies given by subcutaneous injection, designed to neutralise one inflammatory messenger precisely.
- Dupilumab: the first of its class, it blocks both IL-4 and IL-13. Approved since 2017, it has shown efficacy in adults and children with moderate-to-severe disease, with several years of experience.
- Tralokinumab and lebrikizumab: they specifically target IL-13.
- Nemolizumab: it targets the IL-31 receptor and focuses above all on itch, often the most disabling symptom.
These treatments have a broadly favourable safety profile, without heavy blood monitoring. The most characteristic side effect of dupilumab remains conjunctivitis, generally manageable. Biologics are particularly suited to chronic and widespread disease.
Level of evidence
★★★★★ — The efficacy of anti-IL-4/IL-13 biologics rests on numerous large randomised trials and now-solid clinical experience.
JAK inhibitors: a new oral and topical generation
JAK inhibitors act "upstream", on an intracellular signalling pathway shared by several cytokines. They come in two forms:
- oral (upadacitinib, abrocitinib, baricitinib): their action is fast and powerful, especially on itch, which is sometimes relieved within a few days;
- topical (ruxolitinib cream): useful for more localised disease.
This power comes with a trade-off: the oral forms require baseline testing and monitoring (blood tests, vigilance for infections and certain cardiovascular and thrombotic risks). Their prescription is therefore supervised and individualised, after medical assessment.
Practical tip
The choice between a biologic and a JAK inhibitor depends on many factors (age, severity, desired speed of action, medical history). It should be discussed case by case with a skin-medicine specialist.
Where does research stand?
Several promising avenues are emerging:
- prevention: the early use of emollients in at-risk infants has been studied, with still-mixed results;
- microbiome therapies: rebalancing the skin flora to limit S. aureus;
- new targets (such as the OX40 pathway or TSLP), under evaluation;
- personalised medicine: identifying markers to choose the right treatment from the outset.
Diet and lifestyle also raise high expectations; we review them in our guide Diet and atopic dermatitis. In children, management has specific features detailed in the guide Childhood atopic dermatitis.
In summary
Atopic dermatitis perfectly illustrates the recent progress of skin medicine. By understanding the trio of skin barrier – microbiome – type-2 inflammation, research has produced targeted treatments that genuinely change the lives of patients with moderate-to-severe disease.
Emollients and barrier care remain essential every day; biologics and JAK inhibitors now offer effective options when topical treatments are no longer enough. The choice is an individualised medical decision.
The Clínica Valorian analysis
What stands out is the shift in perspective: atopic dermatitis is no longer an inevitability that is temporarily "soothed", but a disease whose mechanisms we understand better and better. In our practice, we always combine a rigorous restoration of the skin barrier with a precise assessment of severity and its impact (sleep, quality of life, itch) before considering a targeted systemic treatment.
The goal is not only to clear the lesions, but to make the skin durably comfortable, choosing, for each person, the best-suited and best-tolerated option.
Valorian level of evidence
- Role of the skin barrier (filaggrin): ★★★★★
- Role of the microbiome / S. aureus: ★★★★☆
- Type-2 inflammation (IL-4/IL-13/IL-31): ★★★★★
- Efficacy of biologics: ★★★★★
- Efficacy of JAK inhibitors: ★★★★★
- Safety of biologics: ★★★★★
- Safety of JAK inhibitors (monitoring): ★★★★☆
- Primary prevention (emollients): ★★★☆☆
Overall assessment: ★★★★★ — Scientific confidence: very high for targeted treatments; active research on the microbiome and prevention.
Key points
- ◆Atopic dermatitis rests on three mechanisms: an impaired skin barrier, type-2 inflammation and a disrupted microbiome.
- ◆Filaggrin mutations and water loss explain the dry skin and the entry of allergens.
- ◆Type-2 inflammation (IL-4, IL-13, IL-31) is the target of the new treatments.
- ◆Biologics (dupilumab, tralokinumab, lebrikizumab, nemolizumab) are effective and well tolerated in moderate-to-severe disease.
- ◆JAK inhibitors (oral and topical) act quickly but require medical monitoring.
References
- Langan SM, Irvine AD, Weidinger S. Atopic dermatitis. Lancet. 2020;396(10247):345-360.
- Palmer CNA et al. Common loss-of-function variants of the epidermal barrier protein filaggrin are a major predisposing factor for atopic dermatitis. Nature Genetics. 2006.
- Kong HH et al. Temporal shifts in the skin microbiome associated with atopic dermatitis disease flares and treatment. Genome Research / Cell Host & Microbe.
- Simpson EL et al. Two Phase 3 Trials of Dupilumab versus Placebo in Atopic Dermatitis (SOLO 1 and SOLO 2). New England Journal of Medicine. 2016.
- Wollenberg A et al. Tralokinumab for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (ECZTRA 1 and ECZTRA 2). British Journal of Dermatology. 2021.
- Silverberg JI et al. Lebrikizumab in moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (ADvocate1 and ADvocate2). New England Journal of Medicine. 2023.
- Kabashima K et al. Nemolizumab plus topical agents in atopic dermatitis with pruritus. New England Journal of Medicine.
- Guttman-Yassky E et al. Upadacitinib in moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (Measure Up 1 and 2). Lancet. 2021.
- Simpson EL et al. Baricitinib in patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (BREEZE-AD). British Journal of Dermatology.
- Papp K et al. Ruxolitinib cream for atopic dermatitis (TRuE-AD1 and TRuE-AD2). Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. 2021.
- Wollenberg A et al. European guideline (EuroGuiDerm) on atopic eczema. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (JEADV).
Frequently asked questions
Is atopic dermatitis an allergy?
Not exactly. It is a chronic inflammatory skin disease, often associated with an allergic background (asthma, rhinitis), but it mainly results from a fragile skin barrier and a particular immune inflammation. Not every flare is triggered by an allergen.
Are emollients still useful with the new treatments?
Yes, absolutely. Restoring and maintaining the skin barrier with emollients remains the essential foundation, including in patients treated with a biologic or a JAK inhibitor. Targeted treatments complement topical care, they do not replace it.
What is the difference between a biologic and a JAK inhibitor?
A biologic is an injectable antibody that blocks one precise inflammatory messenger (for example IL-13). A JAK inhibitor is a drug (oral or as a cream) that acts on a signalling pathway shared by several messengers. Oral JAK inhibitors are often faster but require blood monitoring.
Do these treatments cure atopic dermatitis?
They do not strictly 'cure' the disease, but they can control it durably: calmer skin, greatly reduced itch, better quality of life. The disease remains chronic and treatment is adjusted over time according to its course.
When is a targeted systemic treatment considered?
When atopic dermatitis is moderate-to-severe and insufficiently controlled by well-conducted topical care, with a significant impact (itch, sleep, quality of life). The decision is individualised, after assessment by a skin-medicine specialist.






